Uniform Domain Name Resolution Policy
- March 22, 2010
Parking is not prima facie illegitimate, but it may require plausible explanation where the respondent has knowledge of the complainant’s…
- March 19, 2010
UDRP’s remedial niche is limited to disputes of abusive registration of domain names rather than trademark infringement. The WIPO Final…
, - March 18, 2010
The Panel in Rba Edipresse, S.L. v. Brendhan Hight / MDNH Inc., D2009-1580 (WIPO March 2, 2010) (discussed a few…
- March 17, 2010
Whether geographically near, as in San Diego Hydroponics & Organics v. Innovative Growing Solutions, Inc., D2009-1545 (March 3, 2010) (registered…
, - March 16, 2010
As for trademarks based on generic terms, however powerful they may be in market A they are unrecognized in market…
- March 15, 2010
In general, a respondent’s registration of a domain name that misspells a trademark, or is composed of added, substituted or…
, - March 12, 2010
The phrase “opportunistic bad faith” is not found in the WIPO Final Report, but was coined by early Panels initially…
- March 11, 2010
Mattel, Inc. owns trademarks for BARBIE, FASHIONISTAS and SO IN STYLE. The Respondent in Mattel, Inc. v. jaomadesigns, FA1001001303036 (Nat.…
- March 10, 2010
Zuccarini is one of those mythic respondents whose registrations of domain names provided the grist for articulating standards of conduct…
, - March 9, 2010
The consensus is that renewal of registration does not affect a registrant’s right to a domain name registered in good…
- March 8, 2010
Yesterday’ Note on precedent in deciding UDRP cases touched on dictionary words and descriptive terms. Theories of bad faith under…
- March 5, 2010
For consistency in the application of domain name law panelists try to anchor their decisions with citations to earlier cases.…