Uniform Domain Name Resolution Policy
- April 9, 2010
Passage of time can support a respondent’s defense of legitimate interest if “before any notice” it used “the domain name…
, - April 8, 2010
For trademarks on the weaker end of the spectrum the complainant cannot simply rely on the respondent’s mode of business.…
, - April 7, 2010
For trademarks on the weaker end of the spectrum the complainant cannot simply rely on the respondent’s mode of business.…
, - April 6, 2010
In at least one respect the UDRP is a friendlier forum for respondents than the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA).…
, - April 5, 2010
Adding a geographic term to a famous trademark is not less infringing because the trademark also happens to be a…
, - April 2, 2010
Paragraph 4(b) of the Policy comes into play when the respondent fails to marshal a defense for rights or legitimate…
, - March 31, 2010
A respondent’s right to continue using a trademark in its domain name after termination of its business relationship with the…
, - March 29, 2010
Nothing could be easier for a registrar owed money (or, in the case herein discussed, the reseller of a registrar)…
- March 26, 2010
Ordinarily, a trademark must have been in existence before the registration of the domain name for a finding of bad…
, - March 25, 2010
The basic ingredients for bad faith are knowledge and intention. Denying is more common than admitting them, and although having…
, - March 24, 2010
Regions, Cities, Municipalities and Towns may wish to control the use of their names on the Internet but there is…
, - March 23, 2010
Rules 12 and 10(a) of the Rules of the Policy are closely connected. Rule 12 grants panelists authority to request…
,