Uniform Domain Name Resolution Policy
- May 13, 2010
Bad faith under paragraph 4(b)(i) of the Policy requires proof that the respondent’s registration of the disputed domain name was…
, - May 12, 2010
There is no consensus on the standards of proof to be applied in reaching a finding of reverse domain name…
, - May 11, 2010
UDRP is not an all-purpose forum for resolving infringement claims. The Policy is limited to abusive registration of domain names.…
- May 10, 2010
Paragraph 4(b)(iii) of the Policy has specific reference to the acts of a competitor. If for its “primary purpose” a…
, - May 7, 2010
Complainants whose unregistered trademarks consist of generic words or descriptive expressions may have standing to maintain the UDRP proceeding, but…
- May 6, 2010
One of the three specified defenses to a claim of abusive registration is proof that “you (as an individual, business,…
- May 5, 2010
Refiling a complaint against the same respondent is not permitted as “of right.” I pointed out in the Note for…
- May 4, 2010
It is useful to pause in dissecting cases and addressing evidentiary issues to outline for those unfamiliar with the UDRP…
, - May 3, 2010
Where there is a parity of right, the first to register a domain name comprised of a string of syllables,…
, - April 30, 2010
The Panel in Fox News Network, L.L.C. v. C&D International Ltd. and Whois Privacy Protection Service, D2004-0108 (WIPO July 22,…
- April 29, 2010
This Note reviews an issue not frequently before a Panel, namely complainant’s right to maintain a subsequent proceeding where the…
- April 28, 2010
Domains that are identical or confusingly similar to a well known trademark of which the respondent cannot plausibly deny knowledge…
,