Uniform Domain Name Resolution Policy
- June 1, 2010
Registration of a domain name inadvertently allowed to lapse is more likely to be recaptured if the complainant has acted…
, - May 28, 2010
The line separating issues within from those outside the scope of the Policy is not always clear. Contract disputes relating…
- May 27, 2010
Fan clubs generally come into existence without express permission and sometimes over the (frequently delayed) objection of the honoree to…
, - May 26, 2010
The twin bete noires of the market are confusion and deception, which (as one legal mechanism) the UDRP is designed…
- May 25, 2010
Silence with knowledge that a respondent has incorporated a trademark in its domain name can support legitimacy if the respondent…
, - May 24, 2010
Parties should be reminded that the UDRP is not a trademark court even though it adjudicates rights to trademark infringing…
, - May 21, 2010
As a general rule placing a disclaimer on the website is not effective to legitimize a disputed domain name, although…
, - May 20, 2010
Concurrent uses of lexical elements that also happen to be trademarks are not necessarily the result of abusive registration and…
- May 19, 2010
Ordinarily, bad faith rests on a finding that the respondent is targeting the complainant, which implies (or at least an…
, - May 18, 2010
To violate paragraph 4(b)(ii) of the Policy the complainant has to prove that the respondent engaged in a “pattern of…
- May 17, 2010
Abusive registration of a disputed domain name presupposes past and present acts by the respondent inimical to the complainant’s trademark…
- May 14, 2010
When challenged for abusive registration respondents’ privacy veils are lifted for the duration of the UDRP proceedings and the WHOIS…
, ,