Uniform Domain Name Resolution Policy
- November 16, 2010
The sole remedy for respondents hauled into a UDRP proceeding without cause is a finding of reverse domain name hijacking.…
, , - November 13, 2010
The doctrine that the first to register a domain name is entitled to keep it does not secure a right…
, , , , , - November 11, 2010
Registrations of domain names are not abusive merely because they happen to be identical or confusingly similar to a trademark.…
, - November 9, 2010
A person is free to choose any string of phonetic elements or numbers as a domain name as long as…
- November 5, 2010
The Panel in Tradewind Media, LLC d/b/a Intopic Media v. Jayson Hahn, D2010-1413 (WIPO October 27, 2010) notes that “we…
, - November 4, 2010
Can there be abusive registration solely by bad faith use? The circumstances under paragraph 4(b)(iv) are different from those of…
, , , , , , - November 2, 2010
The UDRP is more forgiving than the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA) in that the complainant must plead and prove…
, - October 29, 2010
Panels use the phrase “initial interest confusion” in two contexts: “[1] confusion of authorship upon reading the content of a…
, - October 28, 2010
A respondent is ordinarily responsible for its behavior immediately upon registration and chargeable for its use of the domain name…
- October 27, 2010
A respondent may, as has frequently been pointed out, rightfully register a domain name incorporating a complainant’s trademark if authorized…
- October 26, 2010
Transferees who acquire domain names from related entities or by purchase and registrants who independently acquire their domain names after…
, - October 22, 2010
“Pay-per-click websites” (noted the Panel in Business Filings Incorporated v. John Thalacker D/B/A Traffico, D2010-1332 (WIPO October 1, 2010)) “are…
, , ,