Uniform Domain Name Resolution Policy
- January 21, 2011
Of the three defenses [4(c)(i-iii) of the Policy], the first and third require proof of a legitimate use. The first…
- January 19, 2011
The UDRP offers a forum with limited jurisdiction to resolve a particular type of dispute in which a domain name…
, , - January 15, 2011
First generation registrants are favored under the UDRP even if use changes to bad faith while transferees are answerable for…
, - January 13, 2011
Potential, inadvertent and artless misspelling of trademarks by Internet users while typing in the domain name was quickly exploited by…
, - January 11, 2011
ICANN's Rules for the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy provide that "[a]ny person or entity may initiate a complaint"…
, - January 8, 2011
Paragraph 4 of the Policy describes the arbitral procedure as a "mandatory administrative proceeding." This should not be misunderstood to…
, - January 6, 2011
Competition for domain names productive for non-trademark business and those corresponding to trademarks is intense. Dictionary words alone or combined…
, , - January 4, 2011
Refiling a complaint against the same respondent for the same domain name is not permitted as "of right." It was…
, - December 30, 2010
The test for proving a common law right is demanding. It cannot be satisfied by asserting facts unaccompanied by evidence…
, - December 28, 2010
There are two classes of respondents whose registrations have been found to be immune from presumptive bad faith use even…
, - December 23, 2010
Domain names that mimic trademarks composed of common words that have achieved extraordinary penetration in the domestic and international marketplaces…
- December 21, 2010
The Panel in Apple Inc. v. Andrew Sievright, Domain Source, D2010-1916 (WIPO December 8, 2010) (<appl.com>) notes that "[t]yposquatting is…
,