Uniform Domain Name Resolution Policy
- June 22, 2011
Domain names violate the Policy when the purpose for their registration is to take advantage of another's trademark. Intent is…
, - June 18, 2011
The complainant's threshold burden for maintaining a UDRP proceeding is to prove that the disputed domain name is identical or…
, - June 16, 2011
Paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy is framed in the present tense: the respondent "lacks rights or legitimate interests" in the…
, - June 11, 2011
“Actively used” does not require the domain name to resolve to an active website, although websites are “the prevalent use.”…
, - June 9, 2011
Adding, subtracting and transposing letters would seem to imply both knowledge of the complainant's trademark and an intention to capitalize…
, - June 5, 2011
Activity is full of evidentiary possibilities. It enlarges the sphere from which inferences can be drawn and can be said…
, - June 1, 2011
The Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C.A at § 1072 provides that registration of a trademark on the principal register is constructive…
, - May 27, 2011
The UDRP forum is available to trademark holders to resolve disputes of cybersquatting, but not for commercial disputes in which…
, - May 25, 2011
Discretion to Terminate a Proceeding When Parties Have Also Commenced a Court Action The UDRP is not a coordinate forum…
, , , - May 20, 2011
Concealing the identity of the beneficial owner of a domain name is perfectly legal. There is no prohibition for using…
, - May 18, 2011
A complainant has standing to prosecute a UDRP dispute regardless of the jurisdiction in which it acquired its trademark or…
- May 13, 2011
It is not illegitimate to use domain names for pay-per-click revenue. According to the WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views…