Uniform Domain Name Resolution Policy
- August 16, 2012
The 3-member Panel in Albir Hills Resort, S.A. v. Telepathy, Inc., D2012-0997 (WIPO July 19, 2012) makes an interesting comment…
, - August 2, 2012
To “oogle” (if “oogle” means “ogle”) is one thing, to “google” another. “Despite the Panel’s extreme suspicions about [the Respondent’s]…
, - July 30, 2012
Complainant’s submission on a UDRP claim must be sufficient to support its demand for forfeiture or it misplays its opportunity.…
, - July 2, 2012
An owner of a trademark registered in any jurisdiction or whose unregistered right is recognized under any national law satisfies…
, - June 27, 2012
Paragraph 18(a) of the Rules of the Policy authorizes the Panel in its discretion to suspend or terminate a UDRP…
, - June 19, 2012
UDRP's anti-cybersquatting proscriptions focus on unfair business practices and deception. They are not intended to suppress competition or restrain commerce.…
, - June 11, 2012
We appear to have reached a stage on the Internet in which every dictionary word and many combinations have been…
, - June 4, 2012
When Panels in different cases involving the same parties rule differently the question is whether one is wrong and the…
, - May 29, 2012
As a general rule, there can be no bad faith registration of a domain name registered prior to the existence…
, - May 21, 2012
Speculating, offering to sell and monetizing domain names composed or dictionary words and descriptive phrases without more are not actionable…
, - May 14, 2012
Words and phrases in common use are attractive equally to purveyors and domainers. That one has a trademark does not…
, - May 7, 2012
Common word trademarks, PRICELESS for example, are no less common for being owned by a major brand complainant and no…
,