Uniform Domain Name Resolution Policy
- November 22, 2012
The Report of the Second WIPO Internet Domain Name Process, The Recognition of Rights and the Use of Names In…
, , - November 16, 2012
Domain names composed of few letters are extremely prized; the more so as the number of third parties legitimately claiming…
, - November 4, 2012
It makes a difference which party initiates a negotiation to sell or purchase a disputed domain name. In SIX Group…
, - October 29, 2012
Respondent’s default to some extent lightens complainant’s burden to prove knowledge and intent while its appearance and rebuttal testimony heightens…
, - October 18, 2012
While merely registering and holding a domain name confers no right or legitimate interest, a domain name can be legitimized…
, - October 11, 2012
A claim of reverse domain name hijacking (RDNH) ultimately rests on complainant untruthfully certifying that “the information contained in th[e]…
, - October 6, 2012
Panels in the formative cases held that there was “no room for general equitable doctrines under the Policy such as…
, - September 27, 2012
See Anthology of Commentaries -- 2014 Question 2.4 of the WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected U.D.R.P. Questions…
, - September 19, 2012
A respondent telegraphs both intent and knowledge when it squats on a trademark by creating minor typographical variations. There are…
, - September 14, 2012
Nominative use of a trademark is permissible when it is fair. It is fair when the domain name identifies the…
, - September 5, 2012
Ownership of domain names can be tenuous. They can be lost beyond recapture through inadvertence. Trademarks, at least the registration…
- August 29, 2012
Timing is a critical factor in determining whether a complainant satisfies its first and third UDRP requirements. When parties’ acquire…
,