UDRP Commentaries
- September 22, 2014
Trademark dictionary words, compounds, phrases and acronyms (or strings of arbitrary letters complainants claim as trademarks) are regularly contested in…
, , , , , , - September 14, 2014
Abuse of process in a UDRP proceeding carries risk for reverse domain name hijacking if respondent appears and proves complainant…
, , , , - August 29, 2014
Lapse of time versus a laches defense to cybersquatting claim in a udrp case is likely to benefit domain name…
, , , , - August 25, 2014
Ordinarily, complaints are dismissed for two reasons (or the same reason but expressed in two different ways): either the complainant…
, , , - August 5, 2014
Paragraph 4(c)(iii) of the Policy recognizes the free speech defense but this is one of the blurry areas of domain…
, , , - July 30, 2014
Of the four enumerated circumstances of bad faith in paragraph 4(b) the first three describe bad faith registration while the…
, , , - July 12, 2014
In the hierarchy of standards “beyond a reasonable doubt” (criminal intent) is higher than “clear and convincing” (URS) which is…
, , - June 29, 2014
The standard of proof for abusive registration is preponderance of the evidence. In lay terms the evidence must be sufficient…
, , - June 2, 2014
See Anthology of Commentaries -- 2014 The burden of proof is always with the complainant but it does not have…
, , - May 18, 2014
See Anthology of Commentaries -- 2014 In civil actions there are two standards of proof, clear and convincing and preponderance…
, , , - April 8, 2014
This article, "Forum of Choice for Arbitrating Cybersquatting: The Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy," was published in Dispute Resolution…
, , - February 10, 2014
See Anthology of Commentaries -- 2014 To prevail in a udrp proceeding trademark rights should be acquired before corresponding domain…
, ,