Internet Corporation of Assigned Names and Numbers
- September 23, 2010
Further on the subject of scope discussed in Yesterday’s Note. The UDRP appears clear in its scope, that it is…
, , - September 21, 2010
It is undoubtedly true that a respondent who holds inactive for many years a domain name identical to a trademark…
, , , - September 2, 2010
UDRP is not centric to any particular national law, but where the parties are “domiciled in the United States and…
, , - August 20, 2010
A certificate of registration satisfies the threshold requirement for maintaining a UDRP proceeding while a mere “intent to use” application…
, , , - August 19, 2010
The first five UDRP decisions (1 commenced in1999 and the first four of 2000) were decided in Complainants’ favor without…
, , - July 23, 2010
It is seen as a deficiency by some that a complainant is remediless under the UDRP for blatant bad faith…
, - July 22, 2010
A credible witness has a better chance of persuading the Panel than one who fails to present his case properly.…
, - July 14, 2010
ICANN’s decision to approve the .xxx suffix for websites with pornographic content is essentially a zoning resolution. It has the…
, , - July 13, 2010
There is no provision under the UDRP for an administrative appeal from an adverse order granting or denying the complaint.…
, , - July 12, 2010
There is a notion that a respondent adjudicated as having a legitimate interest in a disputed domain name can be…
, - July 9, 2010
Paragraph 18(a) of the Rules of the Policy authorizes the Panel in its discretion to suspend or terminate a UDRP…
, , - July 2, 2010
UDRP jurisprudence did not come ready made. Panelists assembled it from readily available legal and cultural artifacts, and it grew…
,