Cybersquatting
- October 28, 2016
The threshold for an actionable claim under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) is a trademark in which…
, , , , , , - October 20, 2016
The UDRP is an online dispute resolution regime. While panelists technically have discretion under Rule 13 to hold in-person hearings…
, , , , , , - October 13, 2016
The UDRP limits parties’ submissions to complaints and responses; accepting "further statements or documents" is discretionary with the Panel (Rule…
, , , , , , , - October 3, 2016
The UDRP lists three nonexclusive circumstances for rebutting lack of rights or legitimate interests in domain names, which if successful…
, , , , , - September 26, 2016
I noted in last week's essay three kinds of cybersquatting complaints typically filed under ICANN'S Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution…
, , , , , , , - September 19, 2016
There are three kinds of udrp disputes, those that are out-and-out cybersquatting, those that are truly contested, and those that…
, , , , , , - September 12, 2016
UDRP complainants are expected to get it right the first time, and if they don't there's a narrow window for…
, , , , , , , - September 5, 2016
No censure attaches to having domain names registered by proxy/privacy services. However, while the practice has become routine for protecting…
, , , , , , - August 29, 2016
Trademarks can be strong in two ways: either inherently distinctive (arbitrary or fanciful marks), or composed of common elements that…
, , , , , - August 22, 2016
The Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) is not an exclusive forum for the resolution of domain names accused…
, , , , , , - August 15, 2016
On the question of reselling domain names on the secondary market, a dissenting panelist in a 2005 case observed that…
, , , , , , - August 8, 2016
There is in the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act a provision not expressly found in the UDRP (at least, not in…
, , , , , , ,