Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act
- February 22, 2011
The UDRP is a "conjunctive" regime, which means that a finding of abusive registration requires proof that the respondent both…
, , - February 19, 2011
An unregistered trademark is no less entitled to protection, 15 U.S.C. §1125 (Section 43 of the Lanham Act) if it…
, - February 12, 2011
In a case not otherwise remarkable, the Respondent in Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. Cyber Domain Services Pvt.Ltd., FA1012001365612 (Nat. Arb.…
, , - February 5, 2011
The Uniform Domain Name Dispute ResoThe Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy is an arbitral process implemented in 1999 by…
, - January 6, 2011
Competition for domain names productive for non-trademark business and those corresponding to trademarks is intense. Dictionary words alone or combined…
, , - December 2, 2010
Where a number of parties share a right to a trademark the complainant has the burden of demonstrating that it…
, , - November 27, 2010
Seaports, airports, cities and municipalities have not fared well in their claims to take possession of disputed domain names. Geographic…
, , - November 23, 2010
The Uniform Domain Name Resolution Policy does not protect holders, who in granting or acquiescing in the registration of domain…
, - November 18, 2010
The Panel noted about Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Sergio Cabrera, FA1008001344053 (Nat. Arb. Forum November 8, 2010) that is was…
, - November 4, 2010
Can there be abusive registration solely by bad faith use? The circumstances under paragraph 4(b)(iv) are different from those of…
, , , , , , - November 2, 2010
The UDRP is more forgiving than the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA) in that the complainant must plead and prove…
, - October 22, 2010
“Pay-per-click websites” (noted the Panel in Business Filings Incorporated v. John Thalacker D/B/A Traffico, D2010-1332 (WIPO October 1, 2010)) “are…
, , ,