Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act
- September 7, 2011
The Panel in Iberostar Hoteles Y Apartamentos, S.L. v. N/A, Yuri Smolyansky, Registrant Organization: N/A Registrant / Contact Privacy Inc.,…
, , , - August 31, 2011
You may well ask, What does deliberative conversation have to do with the making of domain name jurisprudence? Mention was…
, , , , - August 18, 2011
Domain names were initially seen as having two lives: providing “addresses for computers that [are] easy to remember ... without…
, - July 29, 2011
Relief under the UDRP is not closed to unregistered trademark holders – they too are covered – but the burden…
, , , - June 29, 2011
A domain name identical or confusingly similar to a trademark is not dispositive of abusive registration; neither is a respondent's…
, - May 25, 2011
Discretion to Terminate a Proceeding When Parties Have Also Commenced a Court Action The UDRP is not a coordinate forum…
, , , - March 26, 2011
In denying relief to a trademark holder for a claim that exceeds the Policy's scope Panels explain that "the decision…
, , - March 24, 2011
A reasoned decision that a dispute is outside the scope of the Policy has the effect of leaving the domain…
, , - March 22, 2011
Paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy requires a complainant to demonstrate that it has a trademark. If registered, the requirement is…
, - March 5, 2011
Trademark owners have an inherent right to protect their brand but not to a corresponding domain name in all instances…
, - March 3, 2011
Paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy is silent on whether the right the complainant is seeking to vindicate must be registered,…
, , , , , , , - March 1, 2011
The disjunctive feature of the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act makes it less tolerant than the UDRP of registrants of domain…
, ,