Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act
- January 17, 2013
I have pointed out in earlier Notes that the Uniform Domain Name Resolution Policy (UDRP) and the Anticybersquatting Protection Act…
, , - December 27, 2012
In a federal action under 15 U.S.C. 8131 (Cyberpiracy protections for individuals) the district court for the Middle District of…
, , - November 22, 2012
The Report of the Second WIPO Internet Domain Name Process, The Recognition of Rights and the Use of Names In…
, , - October 11, 2012
A claim of reverse domain name hijacking (RDNH) ultimately rests on complainant untruthfully certifying that “the information contained in th[e]…
, - July 2, 2012
An owner of a trademark registered in any jurisdiction or whose unregistered right is recognized under any national law satisfies…
, - June 27, 2012
Paragraph 18(a) of the Rules of the Policy authorizes the Panel in its discretion to suspend or terminate a UDRP…
, - March 23, 2012
Trademark law recognizes (with some qualification) that two parties can be entitled to use similar, even identical lexical strings where…
, - January 12, 2012
Unless personal names have achieved trademark status they are not protected under the UDRP and there can be no injunctive…
, , , , , , - December 15, 2011
The Policy’s scope is limited to “‘abusive registrations’ made with bad faith intent to profit commercially from others’ trademarks.” Second…
, , - November 17, 2011
There are two lines of reasoning from U.S. circuit courts on the issue of whether transfer of a domain name…
, - October 25, 2011
There is no administrative appeal to a UDRP order, but the aggrieved party has the right to challenge an order…
, - September 14, 2011
See Anthology of Commentaries -- 2014 In commencing the administrative proceeding, the complainant certifies "that the information contained in th[e]…
, , , , ,