- December 17, 2009The question of what constitutes notice of the dispute arises in connection with paragraph 4(c)(i) of the Policy. The respondent…
- December 16, 2009The Panel in BECA Inc. v. CanAm Health Source, Inc., D2004-0298 (WIPO July 23, 2004) points out that “[t]rademark rights…
- December 15, 2009The rule of non-use of a domain name incorporating a well known trademark was laid down in Telstra Corporation Limited…
- December 14, 2009In science there are multiple examples of people in different locations contemporaneously discovering the same laws of nature, inventing the…
- December 11, 2009Yesterday’s Note discussed a Respondent’s attempt to explain how a string of syllables forming a non-word – for all appearances…
- December 10, 2009However sincerely a respondent may believe that its acquisition of a domain name from a prior registrant is in good…
- December 9, 2009Unless personal names have trademark status they are not protected under the Policy. Excluded are living persons whose reputations are…
- December 8, 2009The WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions records two views on using domain names identical or…
- December 7, 2009To what extent should the representation and warranty provision of the domain name registration agreement be factored into an analysis…
- December 4, 2009Paragraph 3(c) of the Rules for UDRP provides that a “complaint may relate to more than one domain name provided…
- December 3, 2009Paragraph 4 of the Policy “sets forth the type of disputes for which [the respondent is] required to submit to…
- December 2, 2009A UDRP complainant has to have something to complain about that states an actionable claim. Unhappiness does not state a…