- November 30, 2010The respondent's sole contribution under paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy should be to confute the complainant's assertion of jurisdiction: that…
- November 27, 2010Seaports, airports, cities and municipalities have not fared well in their claims to take possession of disputed domain names. Geographic…
- November 23, 2010The Uniform Domain Name Resolution Policy does not protect holders, who in granting or acquiescing in the registration of domain…
- November 20, 2010Paragraph 4(c)(i) of the Policy contains three conjunctive elements: “before any notice to you of the dispute”, “[you made] demonstrable…
- November 18, 2010The Panel noted about Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Sergio Cabrera, FA1008001344053 (Nat. Arb. Forum November 8, 2010) that is was…
- November 16, 2010The sole remedy for respondents hauled into a UDRP proceeding without cause is a finding of reverse domain name hijacking.…
- November 13, 2010The doctrine that the first to register a domain name is entitled to keep it does not secure a right…
- November 11, 2010Registrations of domain names are not abusive merely because they happen to be identical or confusingly similar to a trademark.…
- November 9, 2010A person is free to choose any string of phonetic elements or numbers as a domain name as long as…
- November 5, 2010The Panel in Tradewind Media, LLC d/b/a Intopic Media v. Jayson Hahn, D2010-1413 (WIPO October 27, 2010) notes that “we…
- November 4, 2010Can there be abusive registration solely by bad faith use? The circumstances under paragraph 4(b)(iv) are different from those of…
- November 2, 2010The UDRP is more forgiving than the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA) in that the complainant must plead and prove…